The burden of uncompensated care looms large for most health care organizations—especially with the press pronouncing the "death" of health care reform. For the most part, the term 'health care reform' refers to some package of legislation that has two elements—increasing the number of Americans with some form of health care coverage (particularly catastrophic coverage) and putting in provisions to reduce overall U.S. health care costs. The first is of particular interest to health care provider organizations and the second to small employers like my organization.
Now, you may be like one of my many friends who is celebrating the death of the current set of health care reform proposals. You may say that the free market alone is enough to both reduce costs and provide expanded coverage (one leading to the other)—by having individuals pay for their own health plans and health services. While I'm a fan of many free market elements in health care reform (including consumer vouchers for purchasing plans), I would caution those of you in that camp that the free market alone won't solve the coverage and cost challenges that face us (for many reasons too numerous to list here).
The rumors of the death of any health care reform proposal are going to continue to destabilize any organization in the health service delivery system that is not solely a private pay operation. The rising number of uninsured and inexplicably underinsured Americans will overwhelm the charitable capacity of the delivery system without some paradigm shift. But, I would caution my friends in the health care field to realize that we can't afford universal coverage without cost containment. It's just not a fiscal possibility.
And, as a small employer that provides health coverage to our team, I can state unequivocally that no health care bill will cause increasing stress—both financial and ethical. Over the past two years at OPEN MINDS, we have had two proposed increases in the cost of health care coverage—15% in 2008, and 40% in 2009. So, I wasn't surprised (though the press seemed shocked) at the recent decision by Anthem to raise their premiums by 30-39%.
I hope you'll join me in pushing our representatives of both parties to take action—to move toward a system of universal coverage (even if only for catastrophic coverage) and to come up with rational solutions to reducing health care costs.
Glad Health Care Reform is Dead? Unlikely, if You're in the Health Care Business (or a Small Business)
Thursday, February 11, 2010 | coverage, free market, funding, health insurance, healthcare, OPEN MINDS, privatization, public option, recommendations, reform, reform costs, system transformation, taxes | 2 comments »
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Those who have been through the insurance wars on the individual market agree. Over the years, our family has been offered policies that denied coverage for otitis media as a pre-existing condition and been denied coverage at an affordable price. Health insurance has become a necessity and the insurance companies hold all the cards. Going without health insurance is not a reasonable alternative because medical professionals and facilities offer no discounted prices for their services.
The thought of health care reform being dead truly shows how seperated our country is politically. If anyone is 'celebrating' this than they are cheering for democrats to fail, not America to win. Great Post.